Methodology
Socionics has many voices, and they don't always agree. Atlas brings them together while showing who said what, where ideas differ, and what we still don't know.
Editorial archive study · not source evidence
The sources we use
Our sources come from one saved version of Wikisocion, identified by d58be5db99f697ecbfc623f09ec3f6ab0c411cd1. Using the same saved copy keeps the source material consistent from one build to the next.
- Types
- 16
- Associations
- 521
- Canonical sources
- 410
- Canonical authors/groups
- 20
What you can read here
The private research edition lets you read the saved archive directly: 410 page-and-section documents and 734,106 indexed words. Showing that text publicly still requires a separate review.
The saved archive has no general reuse license. We keep links to the originals so you can check the sources, including material we cannot publish here.
Relations
We checked all 256 type pairings against both the original table and its published page. There are 14 guides to help you explore them. In Benefit and Supervision, each person has a different role. Where authors disagree about the direction, we show that disagreement.
About the artwork
The 16 Japanese-inspired color studies give each type a visual identity. They are artwork, not evidence about personality or pictures of particular people. The type names are always shown in text too.
What’s missing
ESEESE-Zamanskayaprofile_zamanskaya.rst.txt exists but has no ESE-Zamanskaya anchor or ESE section.
EIEEIE-ZamanskayaNo EIE-Zamanskaya anchor exists in the Zamanskaya profile source; the EIE main page has no resolvable Zamanskaya section.
LSILSI-ZamanskayaNo LSI-Zamanskaya anchor exists in the Zamanskaya profile source; the LSI main page has no resolvable Zamanskaya section.
SEESEE-ZamanskayaNo SEE-Zamanskaya anchor exists in profile_zamanskaya.rst.txt
LIELIE-ZamanskayaNo LIE-Zamanskaya anchor exists in profile_zamanskaya.rst.txt